Ho, Laura; Powell, Catherine; Volpp, Leti. "(Dis)assembling rights of women workers along the global assembly line: human rights and the garment industry." (Symposium: Political Lawyering: Conversations on Progressive Social Change) Harvard Civil Rights-Civil Liberties Law Review v31, n2 (Summer, 1996):383-414.
Abstract:
The transnational nature of the garment industry in the 1990s
requires flexible and innovative strategies to protect workers' human
rights. The traditional separate global-local approach is an outdated
paradigm. Extraterritorially-applied US labor laws, public international
law, and US trade laws, as well as NAFTA, GATT, and World Trade
Organization provisions can be used to protect these workers. Union and
corporate codes of conduct are also useful. Organized workers, activists,
and consumers can bring an end to the abuses of global assembly line
sweatshops.
Abstract:
African-Americans, like all human beings, have the ethical,
moral and political right to education, and many American universities are
neglecting their role in the realization of these rights. Without
education, a citizen cannot fully participate in shaping their community,
nor can they
function on equal terms with fellow citizens. Failure of universities to
equally represent races and cultures, and to pursue affirmative action,
reflects a failure to uphold human rights.
Stromquist, Nelly P. "Sex-equity legislation in education: the state as promoter of women's rights." Review of Educational Research v63, n4 (Winter, 1993):379 (29 pages).
Abstract:
Women as a group have greater success accessing educational
institutions as students, rather than making significant progress obtaining
jobs as professors or as educational administrators. Marginal influence is
evident in curriculum content and teacher training. The federal government
has initiated measures to achieve gender equity. This is evident from a
study
of sex-equity legislation in education.
United Nations (1995). The World's Women. Trends and Statistics. UN Publications, NY.
Abstract:
Economic and social changes in post-colonial Botswana and
Zimbabwe have improved women's situations but have not removed women's
economic, legal, social and educational barriers. Improvements include
access to education and women being granted majority status. Gender
discrimination is prohibited in both countries but economic equality is not
ensured in Zimbabwe and hiring discrimination is allowed in Botswana.
Married women have limited rights to property ownership and use. Freedom
from family obligations was one benefit but the extended support network
has also beenundermined.