|
The New Era Foreign Policy Project is part of the Center for America's
Global Strategic Challenges, a Berkeley-Duke collaboration based at the
Institute of International Studies (IIS) at Berkeley and the Terry Sanford
Institute of Public Policy at Duke. The project is funded by the Carnegie
Corporation of New York, the Rockefeller Brothers Fund, and the Travers Foreign
Policy Endowment.
What kind of a world does the U.S. want to inhabit in 2012, and
what policies should the U.S. pursue now to promote that outcome? This
is the core question around which the New Era Foreign Policy Project
is organized. Our rationale is that responsible U.S. global engagement
should be systematically proactive, seeking to understand significant
medium and long-term global changes, and to influence strategically
the impact of such trends on U.S. interests and those of the rest of
the world. We intend to provide a rich and dynamic alternative to the
short-term mindset that currently dominates debates in many think-tanks,
government circles, and the media. Our work will be broadly framed
at developing intellectual frameworks and focused on actionable policy
proposals and related strategies.
We start from a simple proposition:
national leaders need new approaches to better anticipate and shape
the future. It is commonplace to observe that we live in a time of
unprecedented dynamism. A practical foreign policy problem follows
directly from this intellectual challenge: Policy during periods of
rapid change becomes overly reactive to events, a form of rolling crisis
management that is more like the practice of emergency room medicine
than it is like the military's notion of "shaping the
battlefield." Our contention is that to be successful, the foreign
policies of a great power instead should aim squarely at being proactive.
Foreign policy writ large, in this view, is about comprehending major
contextual and environmental changes taking place in the world and
steering, directing, and influencing the impact of those trends over
a reasonable time frame. That is our analytic and practical goal: to
understand what it means to think and act strategically for starting
to shape foreign policy out to 2012, and to derive from those understandings
tactical foreign policy actions that contribute to longer term goals.
23 August 2005
|